测试环境 redhat 6.2
★ 前言
本文讨论gcc的一些常用编译选项对代码的影响。当然代码变了，
它的内存布局也就会变了，随之exploit也就要做相应的变动。
gcc的编译选项实在太多，本文检了几个最常用的选项。
★ 演示程序
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ cat > test.c
#include
void hi(void)
{
printf("hi");
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
hi();
return 0;
}
★ 一般情况
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gcc -o test test.c
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ wc -c test
11773 test
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gdb -q test
(gdb) disass main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x80483e4 : push %ebp
0x80483e5 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80483e7 : call 0x80483d0
0x80483ec : xor %eax,%eax
0x80483ee : jmp 0x80483f0
0x80483f0 : leave
0x80483f1 : ret
....
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) disass hi
Dump of assembler code for function hi:
0x80483d0 : push %ebp
0x80483d1 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80483d3 : push $0x8048450
0x80483d8 : call 0x8048308
0x80483dd : add $0x4,%esp
0x80483e0 : leave
0x80483e1 : ret
0x80483e2 : mov %esi,%esi
End of assembler dump.
来看看部分的内存映象
(内存高址)
+--------+
|bffffbc4| argv的地址(即argv[0]的地址)
0xbffffb84 +--------+
|00000001| argc的值
0xbffffb80 +--------+
|400309cb|main的返回地址
0xbffffb7c +--------+ <-- 调用main函数前的esp
|bffffb98| 调用main函数前的ebp
0xbffffb78 +--------+ <-- main函数的ebp
|080483ec| hi()的返回地址
0xbffffb74 +--------+
|bffffb78| 调用hi()前的esp
0xbffffb70 +--------+
|08048450| "hi"的地址
0xbffffb6c +--------+
| ...... |
(内存低址)
leave 指令所做的操作相当于MOV ESP,EBP 然后 POP EBP
ret 指令所做的操作相当于POP EIP
★ -O 编译选项
With `-O', the compiler tries to reduce code size and execution time.
When you specify `-O', the two options `-fthread-jumps' and
`-fdefer-pop' are turned on
优化，减少代码大小和执行的时间
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gcc -O -o test test.c
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ wc -c test
11757 test
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gdb -q test
(gdb) disass main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x80483d8 : push %ebp
0x80483d9 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80483db : call 0x80483c8
0x80483e0 : xor %eax,%eax
0x80483e2 : leave
0x80483e3 : ret
0x80483e4 : nop
...
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) disass hi
Dump of assembler code for function hi:
0x80483c8 : push %ebp
0x80483c9 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80483cb : push $0x8048440
0x80483d0 : call 0x8048308
0x80483d5 : leave
0x80483d6 : ret
0x80483d7 : nop
End of assembler dump.
在main()中，把一条jmp指令优化掉了，很显然，这条指令是可以不需要的。
在hi()中，把add $0x4,%esp优化掉了，这会不会使stack不平衡呢？
来看看部分的内存映象
(内存高址)
+--------+
|bffffbc4| argv的地址(即argv[0]的地址)
0xbffffb84 +--------+
|00000001| argc的值
0xbffffb80 +--------+
|400309cb|main的返回地址
0xbffffb7c +--------+ <-- 调用main函数前的esp
|bffffb98| 调用main函数前的ebp
0xbffffb78 +--------+ <-- main函数的ebp
|080483e0| hi()的返回地址
0xbffffb74 +--------+
|bffffb78| 调用hi()前的esp
0xbffffb70 +--------+
|08048440| "hi"的地址
0xbffffb6c +--------+
| ...... |
(内存低址)
leave 指令所做的操作相当于把MOV ESP,EBP 然后 POP EBP
看到leave指令操作了没有，先把ebp-->esp，再pop ebp，这样即使
在过程内堆栈的esp,ebp是不平衡的，但只要返回时候碰到leave指令
就会平衡了，所以把add $0x4,%esp优化掉也是没有问题的。
★ -O2 编译选项
-O2 Optimize even more. Nearly all supported optimizations that do
not involve a space-speed tradeoff are performed. Loop unrolling
and function inlining are not done, for example. As compared to -O,
this option increases both compilation time and the performance of
the generated code.
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gcc -O2 -o test test.c
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ wc -c test
11757 test
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gdb -q test
(gdb) disass main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x80483d8 : push %ebp
0x80483d9 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80483db : call 0x80483c8
0x80483e0 : xor %eax,%eax
0x80483e2 : leave
0x80483e3 : ret
...
0x80483ef : nop
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) disass hi
Dump of assembler code for function hi:
0x80483c8 : push %ebp
0x80483c9 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80483cb : push $0x8048440
0x80483d0 : call 0x8048308
0x80483d5 : leave
0x80483d6 : ret
0x80483d7 : nop
End of assembler dump.
由于程序比较简单，再优化也没有好优化的了，所以跟-O出来的一样。
★ -fomit-frame-pointer 编译选项
-fomit-frame-pointer
Don't keep the frame pointer in a register for functions
that don't need one. This avoids the instructions to save,
set up and restore frame pointers; it also makes an extra
register available in many functions. It also makes
debugging impossible on most machines.
忽略帧指针。这样在程序就不需要保存，安装，和恢复ebp了。这样ebp也就是一个
free的register了，在函数中就可以随便使用了。
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gcc -fomit-frame-pointer -o test test.c
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ wc -c test
11773 test
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gdb -q test
(gdb) disass main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x80483e0 : call 0x80483d0
0x80483e5 : xor %eax,%eax
0x80483e7 : jmp 0x80483f0
0x80483e9 : lea 0x0(%esi,1),%esi
0x80483f0 : ret
....
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) disass hi
Dump of assembler code for function hi:
0x80483d0 : push $0x8048450
0x80483d5 : call 0x8048308
0x80483da : add $0x4,%esp
0x80483dd : ret
0x80483de : mov %esi,%esi
End of assembler dump.
在main()和hi()中都去掉了以下指令
push %ebp
mov %esp,%ebp//这两条指令安装
leave//这条指令恢复
来看看部分的内存映象
(内存高址)
+--------+
|bffffbc4| argv的地址(即argv[0]的地址)
0xbffffb84 +--------+
|00000001| argc的值
0xbffffb80 +--------+
|400309cb|main的返回地址
0xbffffb7c +--------+
|080483e5| hi()的返回地址
0xbffffb78 +--------+
|08048450| "hi"字符串的地址
0xbffffb74 +--------+
| ...... |
(内存低址)
没有保存上层执行环境的ebp.
★ -fomit-frame-pointer && -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer编译选项去掉了
push %ebp
mov %esp,%ebp//这两条指令安装
leave//这条指令恢复
-O2编译选项去掉了
add $0x4,%esp
两个加起来会不会这四条指令一起去掉，从而使stack不平衡呢？
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gcc -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -o test test.c
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ wc -c test
11741 test
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gdb -q test
(gdb) disass main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x80483d8 : call 0x80483c8
0x80483dd : xor %eax,%eax
0x80483df : ret
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) disass hi
Dump of assembler code for function hi:
0x80483c8 : push $0x8048430
0x80483cd : call 0x8048308
0x80483d2 : add $0x4,%esp
0x80483d5 : ret
0x80483d6 : mov %esi,%esi
End of assembler dump.
来看看部分的内存映象
(内存高址)
+--------+
|bffffbc4| argv的地址(即argv[0]的地址)
0xbffffb84 +--------+
|00000001| argc的值
0xbffffb80 +--------+
|400309cb|main的返回地址
0xbffffb7c +--------+
|080483dd| hi()的返回地址
0xbffffb78 +--------+
|08048430| "hi"字符串的地址
0xbffffb74 +--------+
| ...... |
(内存低址)
此时就没有把add $0x4,%esp优化掉，如果优化掉的话，整个stack就
会变的不平衡，从而会导致程序出错。
★ -fPIC 编译选项
-fPIC If supported for the target machine, emit position-independent
code, suitable for dynamic linking,even if branches need large
displacements.
产生位置无关代码（PIC），一般创建共享库时用到。
在x86上，PIC的代码的符号引用都是通过ebx进行操作的。
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gcc -fPIC -o test test.c
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ wc -c test
11805 test
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gdb -q test
(gdb) disass main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x80483f8 : push %ebp
0x80483f9 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80483fb : push %ebx
0x80483fc : call 0x8048401
0x8048401 : pop %ebx//取得该指令的地址
0x8048402 : add $0x1093,%ebx//此时ebx里面存放着是GOT表的地址
0x8048408 : call 0x80483d0
0x804840d : xor %eax,%eax
0x804840f : jmp 0x8048411
0x8048411 : mov 0xfffffffc(%ebp),%ebx
0x8048414 : leave
0x8048415 : ret
...
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) disass hi
Dump of assembler code for function hi:
0x80483d0 : push %ebp
0x80483d1 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80483d3 : push %ebx
0x80483d4 : call 0x80483d9
0x80483d9 : pop %ebx
0x80483da : add $0x10bb,%ebx
0x80483e0 : lea 0xffffefdc(%ebx),%edx
0x80483e6 : mov %edx,%eax
0x80483e8 : push %eax
0x80483e9 : call 0x8048308
0x80483ee : add $0x4,%esp
0x80483f1 : mov 0xfffffffc(%ebp),%ebx
0x80483f4 : leave
0x80483f5 : ret
0x80483f6 : mov %esi,%esi
End of assembler dump.
来看看部分的内存映象
(内存高址)
+--------+
|bffffbc4| argv的地址(即argv[0]的地址)
0xbffffb84 +--------+
|00000001| argc的值
0xbffffb80 +--------+
|400309cb|main的返回地址
0xbffffb7c +--------+ <-- 调用main函数前的esp
|bffffb98| 调用main函数前的ebp
0xbffffb78 +--------+ <-- main函数的ebp
|401081ec| 保存的ebx
0xbffffb74 +--------+
|0804840d| （存放过call 0x8048401的下一条指令地址）
0xbffffb70 +--------+
|bffffb78| 调用hi()前的esp
0xbffffb6c +--------+
|08049494| GOT表地址
0xbffffb68 +--------+
|08048470|（存放过call 0x80483d9的下一条指令地址）
0xbffffb64 +--------+
| ...... |
(内存低址)
★ -static 编译选项
-static
On systems that support dynamic linking, this prevents
linking with the shared libraries. On other systems,
this option has no effect.
把一些函数都静态的编译到程序中，而无需动态链接了。
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gcc -o test -static test.c
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ wc -c test
962808 test
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ gdb -q test
(gdb) disass main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x80481b4 : push %ebp
0x80481b5 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80481b7 : call 0x80481a0
0x80481bc : xor %eax,%eax
0x80481be : jmp 0x80481c0
0x80481c0 : leave
0x80481c1 : ret
...
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) disass hi
Dump of assembler code for function hi:
0x80481a0 : push %ebp
0x80481a1 : mov %esp,%ebp
0x80481a3 : push $0x8071528
0x80481a8 : call 0x804865c
0x80481ad : add $0x4,%esp
0x80481b0 : leave
0x80481b1 : ret
0x80481b2 : mov %esi,%esi
End of assembler dump.
[alert7@redhat62 alert7]$ ldd test
not a dynamic executable
-static出来的代码已经没有PLT了，GOT虽然有，已经全部为0了。
